12 complete symptom paths42 guides and 60 questions in each1,460 Grade A articlesOne searchable, connected knowledge library140 official sourcesEvidence context with explicit limits
House Observatory · Instrument 03

Weather
Correlator

Compare symptom dates with rain, wind, freeze, thaw or heat events and test whether a repeatable lag exists.

Core principleA repeated timing relationship is evidence. One coincidence is not a pathway.
INPUT

Compare event days

Use day numbers from a shared starting date. Example: day 1, 5, 9.

Record negative events tooA major storm without the symptom weakens a simple rain-only theory.
RESULTStrong repeated timing pattern
100%weather events matched inside the selected lag
Best exact lag1 days
Matched events4
Unmatched weather0

Matched events support timing correlation, while unmatched relevant events weaken a simple one-trigger explanation.

Next useful recordContinue logging both positive and negative weather events and add wind direction, intensity or freeze-thaw context where relevant.
Local correlation records

Keep matching and non-matching events.

No locally saved correlations yet.

01

Define the event

Rain, wind direction, thaw or heat must be described consistently.

02

Test the lag

Immediate drips and delayed stains can belong to different transport paths.

03

Keep non-events

Relevant storms without recurrence are evidence against some explanations.

04

Verify after repair

Count the trigger events that pass without reproducing the symptom.